For help understanding this visualization, see guide video or guide note on Benchmarks Dashboard.
To see the full name of subgroup, hover pointer over short name.

 
 
Your results compared to PEERS   ◀
Your results compared to COHORT ▶
Areas of strength in GREEN
Areas of concern in RED
Within campus differences
sm (.1)med. (.3)lrg. (.5)
 
mean
overall
tenured
pre-ten
ntt
full
assoc
men
women
white
foc
asian
urm
ten vs pre-ten
ten vs ntt
full vs assoc
men vs women
white vs foc
white vs asian
white vs urm
2018
Leadership: Senior
3.27
 
tenured
 
 
foc
asian
 
-
Pres/Chancellor: Pace of decision making
3.29
 
tenured
 
 
 
 
 
-
Pres/Chancellor: Stated priorities
3.29
 
tenured
 
 
 
 
 
-
Pres/Chancellor: Communication of priorities
3.25
 
tenured
 
men
 
asian
 
-
CAO: Pace of decision making
3.30
pre-ten
tenured
 
 
foc
 
urm
-
CAO: Stated priorities
3.24
pre-ten
tenured
 
 
foc
asian
urm
-
CAO: Communication of priorities
3.27
pre-ten
tenured
 
 
foc
asian
urm
-
CAO: Ensuring faculty input
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Leadership: Divisional
3.40
 
tenured
 
women
 
 
 
 
Dean: Pace of decision making
3.49
 
 
 
women
 
 
 
 
Dean: Stated priorities
3.45
 
tenured
 
women
 
asian
 
 
Dean: Communication of priorities
3.43
 
tenured
 
women
 
 
 
 
Dean: Ensuring faculty input
3.23
tenured
 
 
women
 
 
 
 
Leadership: Departmental
3.78
tenured
tenured
 
women
foc
asian
urm
+
Head/Chair: Pace of decision making
3.75
tenured
tenured
full
women
foc
asian
urm
 
Head/Chair: Stated priorities
3.67
tenured
tenured
full
 
foc
asian
urm
+
Head/Chair: Communication of priorities
3.70
tenured
tenured
 
women
foc
 
urm
 
Head/Chair: Ensuring faculty input
3.75
tenured
tenured
 
women
foc
asian
urm
+
Head/Chair: Fairness in evaluating work
4.05
tenured
 
 
women
foc
asian
urm
+
Leadership: Faculty
3.42
tenured
tenured
 
men
foc
 
urm
+
Faculty leaders: Pace of decision making
3.32
 
tenured
 
men
 
 
urm
+
Faculty leaders: Stated priorities
3.45
tenured
tenured
 
men
foc
 
urm
+
Faculty leaders: Communication of priorities
3.44
tenured
tenured
 
men
foc
 
urm
 
Faculty leaders: Ensuring faculty input
3.50
tenured
tenured
 
 
foc
 
urm
+
Related Survey Items
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Priorities are stated consistently
3.02
tenured
tenured
 
 
white
white
white
-
Priorities are acted on consistently
2.81
 
tenured
 
 
white
white
 
-
Changed priorities negatively affect my work
2.75
tenured
tenured
 
 
 
white
 
-
CAO: Support in adapting to change
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Visible leadership for support of diversity
3.90
 
tenured
 
 
foc
asian
urm