Visit coache.gse.harvard.edu for more partner resources.
© Copyright 2023, The President & Fellows of Harvard College
For help understanding this visualization, see
guide video or
guide note
on Benchmarks Dashboard.
To see the full name of subgroup, hover pointer over short name.
Related tables:
Means
Frequencies
Your results compared to PEERS ◖
Your results compared to COHORT ◗ |
Areas of strength in BLUE
Areas of concern in RED |
Within campus differences
sm (.1) med. (.3) lrg. (.5) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
mean
|
overall
|
tenured
|
pre-ten
|
ntt
|
full
|
assoc
|
men
|
women
|
white
|
foc
|
asian
|
urm
|
ten vs pre-ten
|
ten vs ntt
|
full vs assoc
|
men vs women
|
white vs foc
|
white vs asian
|
white vs urm
|
2021
|
||||||
Departmental Collegiality
|
3.68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tenured
|
assoc
|
women
|
foc
|
asian
|
urm
|
|
||||||
Colleagues support work/life balance
|
3.69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assoc
|
|
foc
|
asian
|
urm
|
|
||||||
Meeting times compatible with personal needs
|
3.91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pre-ten
|
|
assoc
|
women
|
|
|
urm
|
|
||||||
Amount of personal interaction w/Pre-tenure
|
3.53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assoc
|
women
|
foc
|
asian
|
urm
|
|
||||||
How well you fit
|
3.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assoc
|
women
|
foc
|
asian
|
urm
|
-
|
||||||
Amount of personal interaction w/Tenured
|
3.49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pre-ten
|
|
assoc
|
women
|
|
asian
|
|
|
||||||
Amount of personal interaction w/NTT
|
3.67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tenured
|
tenured
|
assoc
|
|
foc
|
asian
|
urm
|
|
||||||
Colleagues pitch in when needed
|
3.57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tenured
|
assoc
|
women
|
|
asian
|
|
-
|
||||||
Department is collegial
|
3.81
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tenured
|
tenured
|
assoc
|
women
|
foc
|
asian
|
urm
|
|
||||||
Colleagues committed to diversity/inclusion
|
3.99
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assoc
|
women
|
foc
|
asian
|
urm
|
|
||||||
Departmental Engagement
|
3.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tenured
|
assoc
|
|
foc
|
asian
|
urm
|
|
||||||
Discussions of undergrad student learning
|
3.61
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tenured
|
tenured
|
|
|
foc
|
asian
|
|
|
||||||
Discussions of grad student learning
|
3.51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pre-ten
|
ntt
|
assoc
|
|
|
asian
|
|
|
||||||
Discussions of effective teaching practices
|
3.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tenured
|
|
men
|
foc
|
asian
|
|
-
|
||||||
Discussions of effective use of technology
|
3.49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tenured
|
assoc
|
|
foc
|
asian
|
|
-
|
||||||
Discussions of current research methods
|
3.20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ntt
|
assoc
|
|
foc
|
asian
|
urm
|
|
||||||
Amount of professional interaction w/Pre-tenure
|
3.61
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assoc
|
women
|
foc
|
asian
|
urm
|
-
|
||||||
Amount of professional interaction w/Tenured
|
3.51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pre-ten
|
ntt
|
assoc
|
women
|
|
asian
|
|
|
||||||
Amount of professional interaction w/NTT
|
3.69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tenured
|
tenured
|
assoc
|
|
foc
|
asian
|
urm
|
|
||||||
Departmental Quality
|
3.54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tenured
|
tenured
|
assoc
|
|
foc
|
asian
|
|
-
|
||||||
Intellectual vitality of tenured faculty
|
3.53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assoc
|
|
foc
|
asian
|
|
|
||||||
Intellectual vitality of pre-tenure faculty
|
3.90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tenured
|
|
|
|
foc
|
asian
|
urm
|
-
|
||||||
Scholarly productivity of tenured faculty
|
3.60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assoc
|
men
|
foc
|
asian
|
|
|
||||||
Scholarly productivity of pre-tenure faculty
|
3.85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tenured
|
|
assoc
|
|
foc
|
asian
|
|
-
|
||||||
Intellectual vitality of NTT faculty
|
3.75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tenured
|
tenured
|
|
men
|
foc
|
asian
|
|
|
||||||
Scholarly productivity of NTT faculty
|
3.62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tenured
|
tenured
|
|
men
|
foc
|
asian
|
|
|
||||||
Teaching effectiveness of tenured faculty
|
3.59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ntt
|
|
|
foc
|
asian
|
|
|
||||||
Teaching effectiveness of pre-tenure faculty
|
3.84
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tenured
|
ntt
|
|
|
foc
|
asian
|
|
|
||||||
Teaching effectiveness of NTT faculty
|
4.04
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tenured
|
tenured
|
|
men
|
foc
|
asian
|
white
|
|
||||||
Dept. is successful at faculty recruitment
|
3.20
|
|
|
N<5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N<5
|
tenured
|
assoc
|
women
|
foc
|
asian
|
|
-
|
||||||
Dept. is successful at faculty retention
|
2.75
|
|
|
N<5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N<5
|
|
assoc
|
|
foc
|
|
urm
|
-
|
||||||
Dept. addresses sub-standard performance
|
2.64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pre-ten
|
ntt
|
|
women
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Related Survey Items
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
||||||
Recruiting part-time faculty
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
||||||
Managing part-time faculty
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|