For help understanding this visualization, see guide video or guide note on Benchmarks Dashboard.
To see the full name of subgroup, hover pointer over short name.
Related tables: Means Frequencies

 
 
Your results compared to PEERS   ◖
Your results compared to COHORT ◗
Areas of strength in BLUE
Areas of concern in RED
Within campus differences
sm (.1) med. (.3) lrg. (.5)
 
mean
overall
Hum
Soc
Phy
Bio
VPA
ECM
HHE
Agr
Bus
Edu
Med
Oth
Hum vs other
Soc vs other
Phy vs other
Bio vs other
VPA vs other
ECM vs other
HHE vs other
Agr vs other
Bus vs other
Edu vs other
Med vs other
Oth vs other
2021
Governance: Trust
2.67
N<5
N<5
N<5
Hum
Soc
Phy
other
 
ECM
N<5
N<5
other
 
other
N<5
-
I understand how to voice opinions about policies
2.74
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
 
Phy
other
other
ECM
N<5
N<5
 
Edu
other
N<5
-
Clear rules about the roles of faculty and administration
2.86
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
Soc
Phy
other
VPA
 
N<5
N<5
other
 
other
N<5
-
Faculty and admin follow rules of engagement
2.73
N<5
N<5
N<5
Hum
Soc
Phy
other
 
ECM
N<5
N<5
other
other
other
N<5
-
Faculty and admin have an open system of communication
2.36
N<5
N<5
N<5
Hum
Soc
Phy
other
 
ECM
N<5
N<5
other
other
other
N<5
-
Faculty and admin discuss difficult issues in good faith
2.50
N<5
N<5
N<5
Hum
Soc
Phy
other
 
ECM
N<5
N<5
other
other
other
N<5
-
Governance: Shared Sense of Purpose
2.36
N<5
N<5
N<5
Hum
Soc
Phy
other
 
ECM
N<5
N<5
other
other
other
N<5
-
Important decisions are not made until there is consensus
1.90
N<5
N<5
N<5
Hum
 
Phy
other
 
ECM
N<5
N<5
other
 
other
N<5
-
Admin ensures sufficient time for faculty input
2.32
N<5
N<5
N<5
Hum
Soc
Phy
other
VPA
ECM
N<5
N<5
other
other
other
N<5
-
Faculty and admin respectfully consider the other's view
2.40
N<5
N<5
N<5
Hum
Soc
Phy
other
VPA
ECM
N<5
N<5
other
other
other
N<5
-
Faculty and admin have a shared sense of responsibility
2.68
N<5
N<5
N<5
Hum
Soc
Phy
other
other
ECM
N<5
N<5
other
other
other
N<5
-
Governance: Understanding the Issue at Hand
2.37
N<5
N<5
N<5
Hum
Soc
Phy
 
 
ECM
N<5
N<5
other
other
other
N<5
-
Faculty governance structures offer opportunities for input
2.48
N<5
N<5
N<5
Hum
 
 
other
VPA
 
N<5
N<5
other
 
other
N<5
-
Admin communicate rationale for important decisions
2.33
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
Soc
Phy
 
 
ECM
N<5
N<5
other
 
other
N<5
-
Faculty and admin have equal say in decisions
2.06
N<5
N<5
N<5
Hum
Soc
Phy
 
 
 
N<5
N<5
other
other
other
N<5
-
Faculty and admin define decision criteria together
2.40
N<5
N<5
N<5
Hum
 
Phy
other
 
ECM
N<5
N<5
other
other
other
N<5
-
Governance: Adaptability
2.40
N<5
N<5
N<5
Hum
Soc
 
 
 
 
N<5
N<5
other
other
other
N<5
-
Shared governance holds up in unusual circumstances
2.28
N<5
N<5
N<5
Hum
Soc
Phy
 
 
 
N<5
N<5
other
other
other
N<5
-
Institution regularly reviews effectiveness of governance
2.27
N<5
N<5
N<5
Hum
Soc
Phy
Bio
 
 
N<5
N<5
other
other
other
N<5
-
Institution cultivates new faculty leaders
2.62
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
 
other
 
 
ECM
N<5
N<5
other
 
other
N<5
-
Governance: Productivity
2.53
N<5
N<5
N<5
Hum
Soc
 
other
 
 
N<5
N<5
other
 
other
N<5
-
Overall effectiveness of shared governance
2.38
N<5
N<5
N<5
Hum
Soc
 
 
 
 
N<5
N<5
 
other
other
N<5
-
My committees make measureable progress towards goals
2.97
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
Soc
Phy
other
VPA
 
N<5
N<5
other
 
other
N<5
-
Public recognition of progress
2.29
N<5
N<5
N<5
Hum
Soc
 
other
 
 
N<5
N<5
other
other
other
N<5
-