For help understanding this visualization, see guide video or guide note on Benchmarks Dashboard.
To see the full name of subgroup, hover pointer over short name.

 
 
Your results compared to PEERS   ◀
Your results compared to COHORT ▶
Areas of strength in GREEN
Areas of concern in RED
Within campus differences
sm (.1)med. (.3)lrg. (.5)
 
mean
overall
tenured
pre-ten
ntt
full
assoc
men
women
white
foc
asian
urm
ten vs pre-ten
ten vs ntt
full vs assoc
men vs women
white vs foc
white vs asian
white vs urm
2018
Departmental Collegiality
3.75
 
tenured
assoc
women
foc
asian
urm
 
Colleagues support work/life balance
3.66
pre-ten
tenured
assoc
women
foc
asian
urm
 
Meeting times compatible with personal needs
3.99
pre-ten
 
assoc
women
foc
asian
urm
 
Amount of personal interaction w/Pre-tenure
3.59
 
 
 
 
foc
asian
 
 
How well you fit
3.63
 
 
 
women
foc
asian
urm
 
Amount of personal interaction w/Tenured
3.53
pre-ten
 
 
 
foc
asian
urm
 
Colleagues pitch in when needed
3.73
 
tenured
assoc
 
foc
asian
urm
 
Department is collegial
3.86
tenured
tenured
 
 
foc
asian
urm
 
Colleagues committed to diversity/inclusion
3.96
 
tenured
 
women
foc
asian
urm
 
Departmental Engagement
3.57
pre-ten
 
 
 
foc
asian
urm
 
Discussions of undergrad student learning
3.70
 
tenured
 
 
foc
 
urm
 
Discussions of grad student learning
3.49
 
ntt
assoc
 
 
 
urm
 
Discussions of effective teaching practices
3.69
 
tenured
 
men
foc
asian
urm
 
Discussions of effective use of technology
3.62
pre-ten
tenured
 
 
foc
asian
urm
+
Discussions of current research methods
3.20
 
ntt
assoc
 
 
 
 
 
Amount of professional interaction w/Pre-tenure
3.73
 
 
 
 
foc
asian
 
 
Amount of professional interaction w/Tenured
3.61
pre-ten
 
 
women
foc
asian
urm
 
Departmental Quality
3.66
 
 
assoc
 
foc
asian
 
+
Intellectual vitality of tenured faculty
3.63
pre-ten
 
 
 
foc
asian
urm
 
Intellectual vitality of pre-tenure faculty
4.09
 
 
 
 
foc
asian
urm
 
Scholarly productivity of tenured faculty
3.67
pre-ten
 
assoc
 
foc
asian
urm
 
Scholarly productivity of pre-tenure faculty
4.04
 
 
 
 
foc
asian
 
 
Teaching effectiveness of tenured faculty
3.62
pre-ten
ntt
assoc
 
foc
asian
urm
 
Teaching effectiveness of pre-tenure faculty
3.91
tenured
ntt
assoc
 
foc
asian
 
 
Dept. is successful at faculty recruitment
3.70
N<5
N<5
 
assoc
 
foc
asian
 
 
Dept. is successful at faculty retention
3.42
N<5
N<5
 
 
women
foc
asian
 
 
Dept. addresses sub-standard performance
2.63
 
 
assoc
women
white
white
white
 
Related Survey Items
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Intellectual vitality of NTT faculty
3.84
 
tenured
full
men
foc
asian
 
+
Scholarly productivity of NTT faculty
3.66
 
tenured
 
men
foc
asian
urm
 
Teaching effectiveness of NTT faculty
4.06
 
tenured
 
 
foc
asian
 
+
Amount of professional interaction w/NTT
3.73
pre-ten
tenured
 
 
foc
asian
urm
 
Amount of personal interaction w/NTT
3.66
pre-ten
tenured
 
 
foc
asian
urm
 
Recruiting part-time faculty
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Managing part-time faculty
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A