warning  This application is optimized for Chrome browser. For best experience, please use Chrome.

For help understanding this visualization, see guide video or guide note on Benchmarks Dashboard.
To see the full name of subgroup, hover pointer over short name.

 
 
Your results compared to PEERS   ◀
Your results compared to COHORT ▶
Areas of strength in GREEN
Areas of concern in RED
Within campus differences
sm (.1)med. (.3)lrg. (.5)
 
mean
overall
Hum
Soc
Phy
Bio
VPA
ECM
HHE
Agr
Bus
Edu
Med
Oth
Hum vs other
Soc vs other
Phy vs other
Bio vs other
VPA vs other
ECM vs other
HHE vs other
Agr vs other
Bus vs other
Edu vs other
Med vs other
Oth vs other
2018
 
 
 
 
 
Your results compared to PEERS   ◀
Your results compared to COHORT ▶
Areas of strength in GREEN
Areas of concern in RED
Within campus differences
sm (.1)med. (.3)lrg. (.5)
 
mean
overall
Hum
Soc
Phy
Bio
VPA
ECM
HHE
Agr
Bus
Edu
Med
Oth
Hum vs other
Soc vs other
Phy vs other
Bio vs other
VPA vs other
ECM vs other
HHE vs other
Agr vs other
Bus vs other
Edu vs other
Med vs other
Oth vs other
2018
Governance: Trust
3.15
N<5
N<5
N<5
Hum
Soc
other
 
 
ECM
N<5
N<5
other
other
other
N<5
 
I understand how to voice opinions about policies
3.10
N<5
N<5
N<5
Hum
Soc
other
 
 
 
N<5
N<5
other
 
other
N<5
 
Clear rules about the roles of faculty and administration
3.21
N<5
N<5
N<5
Hum
Soc
other
 
 
ECM
N<5
N<5
 
other
other
N<5
 
Faculty and admin follow rules of engagement
3.29
N<5
N<5
N<5
Hum
 
other
other
other
ECM
N<5
N<5
other
other
 
N<5
 
Faculty and admin have an open system of communication
3.08
N<5
N<5
N<5
Hum
Soc
 
 
 
ECM
N<5
N<5
other
other
other
N<5
 
Faculty and admin discuss difficult issues in good faith
3.17
N<5
N<5
N<5
Hum
Soc
 
other
other
ECM
N<5
N<5
other
other
 
N<5
 
Governance: Shared Sense of Purpose
3.00
N<5
N<5
N<5
Hum
Soc
 
other
 
ECM
N<5
N<5
other
other
other
N<5
 
Important decisions are not made until there is consensus
2.58
N<5
N<5
N<5
Hum
 
 
other
 
 
N<5
N<5
other
other
other
N<5
-
Admin ensures sufficient time for faculty input
2.89
N<5
N<5
N<5
Hum
Soc
 
 
 
ECM
N<5
N<5
other
other
other
N<5
 
Faculty and admin respectfully consider the other's view
3.13
N<5
N<5
N<5
Hum
Soc
 
other
other
ECM
N<5
N<5
other
other
other
N<5
 
Faculty and admin have a shared sense of responsibility
3.42
N<5
N<5
N<5
Hum
Soc
 
 
other
ECM
N<5
N<5
other
other
other
N<5
 
Governance: Understanding the Issue at Hand
2.98
N<5
N<5
N<5
Hum
Soc
other
other
 
ECM
N<5
N<5
other
other
other
N<5
 
Faculty governance structures offer opportunities for input
3.07
N<5
N<5
N<5
Hum
Soc
other
 
 
 
N<5
N<5
other
other
other
N<5
 
Admin communicate rationale for important decisions
2.96
N<5
N<5
N<5
Hum
Soc
other
 
 
ECM
N<5
N<5
 
other
other
N<5
-
Faculty and admin have equal say in decisions
2.62
N<5
N<5
N<5
Hum
Soc
 
other
other
ECM
N<5
N<5
 
other
other
N<5
-
Faculty and admin define decision criteria together
3.06
N<5
N<5
N<5
Hum
Soc
other
other
other
ECM
N<5
N<5
 
other
other
N<5
 
Governance: Adaptability
2.96
N<5
N<5
N<5
Hum
Soc
other
 
 
ECM
N<5
N<5
 
other
other
N<5
 
Shared governance holds up in unusual circumstances
2.93
N<5
N<5
N<5
Hum
Soc
other
 
 
 
N<5
N<5
other
other
other
N<5
 
Institution regularly reviews effectiveness of governance
2.80
N<5
N<5
N<5
Hum
Soc
 
Bio
 
ECM
N<5
N<5
 
other
other
N<5
 
Institution cultivates new faculty leaders
3.11
N<5
N<5
N<5
Hum
Soc
other
other
other
ECM
N<5
N<5
 
other
 
N<5
 
Governance: Productivity
3.10
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
Soc
other
other
 
 
N<5
N<5
 
other
other
N<5
-
Overall effectiveness of shared governance
3.08
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
Soc
other
other
VPA
ECM
N<5
N<5
 
other
other
N<5
 
My committees make measureable progress towards goals
3.27
N<5
N<5
N<5
Hum
 
other
 
other
ECM
N<5
N<5
 
 
 
N<5
-
Public recognition of progress
2.92
N<5
N<5
N<5
Hum
Soc
other
 
other
 
N<5
N<5
other
other
 
N<5
-
 
 
 
Governance: Trust
I understand how to voice opinions about policies
Clear rules about the roles of faculty and administration
Faculty and admin follow rules of engagement
Faculty and admin have an open system of communication
Faculty and admin discuss difficult issues in good faith
Governance: Shared Sense of Purpose
Important decisions are not made until there is consensus
Admin ensures sufficient time for faculty input
Faculty and admin respectfully consider the other's view
Faculty and admin have a shared sense of responsibility
Governance: Understanding the Issue at Hand
Faculty governance structures offer opportunities for input
Admin communicate rationale for important decisions
Faculty and admin have equal say in decisions
Faculty and admin define decision criteria together
Governance: Adaptability
Shared governance holds up in unusual circumstances
Institution regularly reviews effectiveness of governance
Institution cultivates new faculty leaders
Governance: Productivity
Overall effectiveness of shared governance
My committees make measureable progress towards goals
Public recognition of progress