For help understanding this visualization, see guide video or guide note on Benchmarks Dashboard.
To see the full name of subgroup, hover pointer over short name.

 
 
Your results compared to PEERS  
Your results compared to COHORT
Areas of strength in GREEN
Areas of concern in RED
Within campus differences
sm (.1)med. (.3)lrg. (.5)
 
mean
overall
tenured
pre-ten
ntt
full
assoc
men
women
white
foc
asian
urm
ten vs pre-ten
ten vs ntt
full vs assoc
men vs women
white vs foc
white vs asian
white vs urm
2018
Governance: Trust
3.15
pre-ten
tenured
 
women
foc
asian
urm
 
I understand how to voice opinions about policies
3.10
pre-ten
tenured
 
women
 
 
urm
 
Clear rules about the roles of faculty and administration
3.21
 
tenured
 
 
foc
 
urm
 
Faculty and admin follow rules of engagement
3.29
pre-ten
tenured
full
 
foc
asian
urm
 
Faculty and admin have an open system of communication
3.08
pre-ten
tenured
full
 
 
asian
 
 
Faculty and admin discuss difficult issues in good faith
3.17
 
tenured
full
 
foc
asian
urm
 
Governance: Shared Sense of Purpose
3.00
tenured
tenured
 
 
 
 
 
 
Important decisions are not made until there is consensus
2.58
 
tenured
full
 
 
 
 
-
Admin ensures sufficient time for faculty input
2.89
tenured
tenured
 
 
 
asian
 
 
Faculty and admin respectfully consider the other's view
3.13
pre-ten
tenured
women
 
asian
 
 
Faculty and admin have a shared sense of responsibility
3.42
 
tenured
 
 
foc
asian
urm
 
Governance: Understanding the Issue at Hand
2.98
 
tenured
 
 
 
 
 
 
Faculty governance structures offer opportunities for input
3.07
 
tenured
 
 
 
 
urm
 
Admin communicate rationale for important decisions
2.96
 
tenured
 
 
 
asian
 
-
Faculty and admin have equal say in decisions
2.62
 
tenured
full
 
white
white
 
-
Faculty and admin define decision criteria together
3.06
pre-ten
tenured
 
 
foc
asian
 
 
Governance: Adaptability
2.96
tenured
tenured
 
 
 
 
 
 
Shared governance holds up in unusual circumstances
2.93
tenured
tenured
 
 
 
white
 
 
Institution regularly reviews effectiveness of governance
2.80
 
tenured
 
men
 
 
 
 
Institution cultivates new faculty leaders
3.11
 
 
assoc
 
foc
asian
urm
 
Governance: Productivity
3.10
tenured
tenured
 
men
 
white
 
-
Overall effectiveness of shared governance
3.08
tenured
tenured
full
men
 
white
 
 
My committees make measureable progress towards goals
3.27
 
tenured
 
men
foc
 
urm
-
Public recognition of progress
2.92
tenured
tenured
full
 
 
 
 
-