For help understanding this visualization, see guide video or guide note on Benchmarks Dashboard.
To see the full name of subgroup, hover pointer over short name.
Related tables: Means Frequencies

 
 
Your results compared to PEERS   ◖
Your results compared to COHORT ◗
Areas of strength in BLUE
Areas of concern in RED
Within campus differences
sm (.1) med. (.3) lrg. (.5)
 
mean
overall
tenured
pre-ten
ntt
full
assoc
men
women
white
foc
asian
urm
ten vs pre-ten
ten vs ntt
full vs assoc
men vs women
white vs foc
white vs asian
white vs urm
2021
Tenure Policies
3.57
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N<5
N/A
N/A
N/A
men
foc
N<5
urm
-
Clarity of tenure process
3.63
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N<5
N/A
N/A
N/A
men
 
N<5
urm
-
Clarity of tenure criteria
3.83
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N<5
N/A
N/A
N/A
men
foc
N<5
urm
-
Clarity of tenure standards
3.54
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N<5
N/A
N/A
N/A
men
foc
N<5
urm
-
Clarity of body of evidence for deciding tenure
3.71
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N<5
N/A
N/A
N/A
men
 
N<5
urm
-
Clarity of whether I will achieve tenure
3.58
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N<5
N/A
N/A
N/A
men
foc
N<5
urm
-
Clarity of grievance procedures
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Consistency of messages about tenure
2.90
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N<5
N/A
N/A
N/A
men
white
N<5
white
-
Tenure decisions are performance-based
3.85
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N<5
N/A
N/A
N/A
men
foc
N<5
urm
 
Tenure Expectations: Clarity
3.34
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N<5
N/A
N/A
N/A
 
white
N<5
white
-
Clarity of expectations: Scholar
3.61
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N<5
N/A
N/A
N/A
men
white
N<5
white
-
Clarity of expectations: Teacher
3.78
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N<5
N/A
N/A
N/A
men
foc
N<5
white
-
Clarity of expectations: Advisor
3.10
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N<5
N/A
N/A
N/A
women
white
N<5
white
-
Clarity of expectations: Colleague
3.25
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N<5
N/A
N/A
N/A
women
 
N<5
 
 
Clarity of expectations: Campus citizen
3.05
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N<5
N/A
N/A
N/A
women
white
N<5
white
 
Clarity of expectations: Broader community
3.08
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N<5
N/A
N/A
N/A
women
white
N<5
white
 
Promotion to Full
3.61
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
assoc
women
foc
asian
urm
 
Dept. culture encourages promotion
3.38
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
assoc
women
foc
asian
urm
 
Reasonable expectations: Promotion
3.54
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
assoc
women
foc
asian
urm
 
Clarity of promotion process
3.98
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
assoc
 
foc
asian
 
 
Clarity of promotion criteria
3.82
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
assoc
women
 
 
urm
 
Clarity of promotion standards
3.60
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
assoc
women
foc
 
urm
 
Clarity of body of evidence for promotion
3.78
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
assoc
women
foc
 
urm
 
Clarity of time frame for promotion
3.39
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
assoc
women
foc
 
urm
 
Clarity of whether I will be promoted
3.01
N/A
N/A
N<5
N/A
N/A
N<5
women
foc
asian
urm
 
Related Survey Items
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
NTT - Clarity of contract renewal process
3.74
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
men
 
white
 
 
NTT - Clarity of contract renewal criteria
3.71
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
men
 
 
 
-
NTT - Clarity of contract renewal standards
3.57
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
men
 
 
urm
-
NTT - Clarity of body of evidence for deciding contract renewal
3.52
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
men
foc
 
urm
-
NTT - Sense of contract renewal
3.91
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
men
foc
white
urm
 
NTT - Clarity of promotion process
3.69
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
foc
 
urm
 
NTT - Clarity of promotion criteria
3.62
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
foc
white
urm
 
NTT - Clarity of promotion standards
3.49
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
foc
white
urm
 
NTT - Clarity of body of evidence for promotion decisions
3.61
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
 
foc
 
urm
 
NTT - Sense of promotion
3.59
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
N<5
men
foc
asian
urm